.
News Alert
UPDATE: Massive Brush Fire Rages In Berkeley,…

Good Riddance to No Child Left Behind, Say State, Local Educators

Relieved of "a one-size-fits-all accountability system," Collingswood students will benefit from a district that can focus on math and literacy improvements, says Superintendent Scott Oswald.

New Jersey schools will be better off without the constraints of No Child Left Behind (NCLB), says a policy expert at the New Jersey Education Association (NJEA).

Moreover, the time and money saved by focusing on strengthening individual student growth instead of teaching to a flawed test will benefit the Collingswood school district, according to Superintendent Scott A. Oswald.

Dawn Hiltner, NJEA Associate Director for Organizing and Coalition Building, said opting out of NCLB “will give New Jersey some relief” from meeting the unrealistic standards of the legislation.

“Under No Child Left Behind, we were supposed to have 100 percent proficiency [in all subjects tested] by 2014,” Hiltner said. “That’s a benchmark that’s impossible to reach.”

Oswald described NCLB as “a one-size-fits-all accountability system” that is measured differently from state to state.

“It makes some really good sound bites to say that 100 percent of kids are going to be proficient in this and that,” he said. “The reality is that students have different strengths. Nobody’s ever going to get every kid to jump that bar because every kid’s different.”

According to both Oswald and Hiltner, there will be no negative financial implications for New Jersey in waiving its participation in NCLB. Collingswood receives some federal money through the U.S. Department of Education under Title I, but its eligibility fluctuates annually based on the poverty level of students in residence, Oswald said.

“Last year Garfield, Sharp, and the middle school were Title I. Newbie jumps in and out, because it depends on your average free and reduced lunch rate in the district,” he said.

“There are more exceptions to the rule than the rule itself.”

A moving target

NCLB detractors criticize its insistence on standardized testing scores, which Hiltner says “sets schools up for failure” by over-emphasizing the failures of underperforming students, including non-native English speakers, children in poverty, and special education students.

“[Lawmakers’] intentions were good,” Hiltner said. “They didn’t want to mask a school as being a high-achieving school if these subgroups were underperforming.”

Due to these constraints, however, NCLB is more likely to unfairly penalize a school where children fall into more than one disadvantaged category, she said.

“If you have a child in the gifted program, his scores only count once,” Hiltner said. “If you have a child who is economically disadvantaged, speaks Spanish at home, and is special ed, his score is going to be reported four times.”

Comparatively, Hiltner said, statewide scores on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) paint a more accurate picture of student achievement in the Garden State. By NAEP metrics, New Jersey usually ranks as high-performing, in the top three or five states nationwide.

“What a lot of states have done [to meet NCLB requirements] is lower their standards so more kids test as proficient,” Hiltner said. “In New Jersey we have very high standards for all children, [and] in some ways, on paper, that works against us.

"There’s so many ways to skew data to show things that aren’t there,” she said.

Focusing on programs that work

Hiltner believes there are a few reasons New Jersey was allowed to waive its participation in NCLB. For one, the state will pilot a teacher evaluation program that addresses calls for tenure reform. Secondly, she says that New Jersey has a good track record of supporting its teachers’ professional development, which is another priority of the legislation.

Finally, Hiltner pointed to a shift at the Department of Education towards establishing regional achievement centers that would provide financial assistance to the neediest school districts, allowing them to direct money to individual schools that most need it.

“I think that it helps the state continue to focus on programs and on school reforms that really work instead of unfairly punishing schools that are working hard to meet the needs of their students,” Hiltner said.

Relieved of NCLB oversight, Oswald said Collingswood will focus on a student growth model that measures children’s academic progress at the beginning and end of each school year.

“If somebody comes in as the slowest runner in the class, that kid can grow the most by the end of the year, but it doesn’t mean he’s going to be the fastest runner,” Oswald said.

Thanks to a new reading curriculum, he said, Collingswood students are improving their literacy “at a wonderful rate for their grade levels,” with many exceeding the average mark. Oswald promised improvements in math will follow once a similar model can be implemented.

“My three questions that I ask are: what are we teaching—curriculum—how do we know the kids are getting it—the assessment piece—and what are we doing for those who don’t?”

SpeakUPNJ February 14, 2012 at 04:05 PM
Nothing is more ridiculous than this statement about NCLB from of all sources a UNION Policy Expert..."Dawn Hiltner, NJEA Associate Director for Organizing and Coalition Building, said opting out of NCLB “will give New Jersey some relief” from meeting the unrealistic standards of the legislation." I am not sure how NJEA officials keep a straight face. NJEA will do anything to get away from ANY focus on UNION member teacher accountability to the students and parents while continuing to lie to the tax payer parents that their children are getting "the best education in the country". When what the children get is in fact the one of the highest average per capital spends on education in the world with dubious at best results. They are happy to get the focus OFF teacher performance again so they can make their outrageous claims without challenge. Do not be fooled. NJEA UNION leadership is an expert on ONE THING and one thing only....continually raising THEIR and UNION member teachers’ salaries and benefits no matter what the outcome is in the classroom. Frankly, the classroom outcome is irrelevant to their primary objectives.
Sean Andrew February 14, 2012 at 07:05 PM
While I do not disagree with the statements about the NJEA and salary (let's be real, that's what a union does), the NCLB waiver does not remove "accountability" from the equation. Instead, it measures it differently. Many educators would argue it measures it in a more responsible manner.
SpeakUPNJ February 14, 2012 at 07:22 PM
Sean "let's be real"? Really? I know what this Union does it hides those goals WE do agree on behind a line of bull called, " It's all about the lids!" And inside NJEA, no it's not. And by the way, Ms Hiltner never said a truer line when it comes to NJEA's interpretation of student achievement vs education spending in NJ than this, " "There’s so many ways to skew data to show things that aren’t there,” she said.
SpeakUPNJ February 14, 2012 at 07:25 PM
LOL...it may well be "all about the LIDS" too in NJEA but I meant KIDS! Typo
Sean Andrew February 14, 2012 at 09:51 PM
I'm not arguing your point about the NJEA - they are in the business of making sure their members get paid and paid well. The real issue is they don't acknowledge that it's their primary role. Their commercials are BS and anyone - even their members - can see through that. My frustration lies not with the NJEA leadership, but with the members who allow that leadership to continue. Every time one of them opens their mouths, they sound dumber and dumber and take teachers - even good teachers - down with them.
SpeakUPNJ February 15, 2012 at 12:07 AM
Sean...Amen...I agree with all you said here. On NCLB I realize it has problems. I think it was an honest attempt to do SOMETHING on this issue. What I do not trust is NJEA, NEA, NJ Dept of Ed and Fed Dept of Ed as currently configured to do anything that will help the students and their parents. In today's politically charged climate I see far too many OTHER agendas in the way of improving student learning. And, that always leads to More Spending, Higher Taxes and NO Improvements.
Sean Andrew February 15, 2012 at 03:52 AM
Ding, ding, ding...politics has no place in our schools. Research does. Figure out what the highest performing countries are doing and replicate it here. Our society is much more diverse and it's members face many more economic challenges, but good teaching can overcome much of that. Get and keep the politics out of education.
DoneWithNews February 15, 2012 at 04:38 AM
And today they send home this work of legal-ese: http://www.collingswood.k12.nj.us/ourpages/auto/2010/8/18/51806174/2415_04%20_M_%20TITLE%201%20-%20PARENTAL%20INVOLVEMENT.pdf ...which is obviously a document designed to talk down to the customers. I mean subjects; customers would have an alternative. Check out the incomplete placeholder language in DISTRICT-WIDE PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT POLICY COMPONENT #4: "4. The school district will coordinate and integrate parental involvement strategies in Part A with parental involvement strategies under the following other programs: (Insert programs, such as: Head Start, Reading First, Early Reading First, Even Start, Parents As Teachers, Home Instruction Program for Preschool Youngsters, and State-operated preschool programs), by: a. School-based parent involvement initiatives." Those of us who have done work in offices know boiler-plate documents when we see them. You forgot to fill in the parts where you were supposed to fill in specific programs (they even told you where you needed to type it in, and got you started with some terms!!). That's worth an F in my class. Maybe you need a healthy breakfast on the taxpayers' dime. These people don't even read their own bureaucracy, and they expect to be regarded as experts on policy?
Sean Andrew February 15, 2012 at 12:03 PM
Just read that, but I didn't read it with the same sense of outrage. Maybe I'm just a person who thinks the teaching is more important than paper. The district is REQUIRED to send the policy home - required by the US Department of Education, as the policy states. I wish the US Department of Education worried more about teaching and learning than killing trees.
SpeakUPNJ February 15, 2012 at 02:06 PM
The US Dept of Education, National Education Association, NJ Dept of Education and NJEA are NOT about teaching. They are about CONTROL ( another word that means setting POLICY). And believe it or not; like it or not; they are definitely in control of our kids. If you do not think so, go to a BOE meeting and try to get one of their policies even "questioned" locally.
Sean Andrew February 16, 2012 at 02:17 AM
The NJEA has nothing to do with local policy. Policy is aligned with state and federal regulation. I get it - this is the Internet and you can type anything you want. That doesn't make you right. Okay, you can have the last comment. I promise I won't respond.
SpeakUPNJ February 16, 2012 at 02:34 AM
Sean, No...you don't get it

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something