.
Feedback

Chip Kelly Wrong Fit for Eagles

Chip Kelly ran a fad PAC-10 offense with some success in the NCAA, but unless he has some new, NFL-ready scheme, his tenure could be a short one in Philadelphia.

The Eagles on Wednesday announced the shocking hire of Chip Kelly to be the next head coach in Philadelphia.

My first reaction is one of abject disappointment. In my opinion, intelligent Eagles fans all breathed a sigh of relief a couple weeks ago when Kelly ended his flirtation with the Eagles to return to Oregon.

At that point, the path was seemingly paved for Gus Bradley to be the next Eagles Head Coach. He seemed to be the best choice: tough, no-nonsense and NFL battle-tested, Bradley would have brought passion and NFL experience to the Eagles.

Chip Kelly will either revolutionize the NFL or fall flat on his face. The likelihood of him being successful is about 10 percent—leaving a 90 percent chance he’ll be a disaster.

At Oregon, his record was 46-7 against the PAC 10, running his gimmick offense. In the college arena, his offense was impressive to watch. It was relentless, attacking every chance it had. Its sheer volume of plays was astounding and beat opposing defenses to exhaustion and confusion. PAC 10 defenses.

When Oregon faced Stanford this season, its vaunted offense managed 14 points. The Ducks were 4-19 on third and fourth downs. When the frenetic Oregon offense was not working, it gave the ball back to the opposing team in about 60 seconds and forced Oregon’s exhausted defense back onto the field.

While running quarterbacks have had a bit of a resurgence in the NFL, there is no time-tested sample to show it will work in the long run. Kelly’s offense puts a premium on a tough, smart, mobile QB—not easy to find and a constant injury risk against NFL defenses.

If Kelly’s offense won’t work in the NFL, which seems likely, then what credentials does he have that justify him becoming a head coach in the NFL? None. Without that, he’s just a guy from the PAC 10.

If the hire of Kelly makes the Eagles retain Mike Vick to run his offense, this hiring is an unmitigated disaster. Vick is a small, timid quarterback at this point. At 33, he has become so brittle, he will last about two games running Kelly’s offense.

Could Kelly be successful? He may be so innovative that he can adapt to the NFL and create another offensive system that is conducive to the NFL game and will work at this level like his gimmick offense worked in the college game. This assumption seems to be a longshot.

In my opinion, Andy Reid did a lot of great things for the Eagles, but it was time for him to go. With the Eagles having jettisoned Reid, fans craved a return to defensive, physical football, as opposed to Reid’s pass-happy approach. Now, the fans are being given the new version of the run-and-shoot offense; a fad that flashes bright for a short time, then is dismantled by the rest of the NFL in short order.

This hire seems to signal the end of Nick Foles’ chance to become the Eagles long-term starting quarterback. Foles earned that chance, but continuing with him seems to be akin to trying to fit a square peg into a round hole.

If an NFL team is trying to sell a college coach to its fan base, it should be a guy who’s been astoundingly successful at the college level. If Nick Saban was the guy, it would be much more legitimate. He has conquered college football in the SEC. Chip Kelly has had four good years at Oregon in the much lower-level PAC-10.

Jim Harbaugh would be the obvious counter-argument; however, his success is a rarity and, no doubt, his 14 years as an NFL quarterback have been an important contributor.

Lurie, Roseman and Don Smolenski are the only people who were privy to Kelly’s presentation in their nine-hour interview. Each is an intelligent, successful guy and Lurie’s two previous hires—Ray Rhodes, and moreso, Andy Reid—have been good choices in their totality. Kelly obviously told the Eagles brass what they wanted to hear and they have earned some credibility in the arena of hiring head coaches.

That being said, hiring Kelly seems more of a risk than the likelihood of any possible rewards warrants. As a diehard Eagles fan, I sincerely hope I look back and eat these words. I will do so happily.

I do not think that will happen because I think this hiring has disaster written all over it. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Collingswood Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Porterincollingswood January 18, 2013 at 09:48 pm
It is exciting. More comments on this story than weeks 5-17 combined. It's re-energizing, and he was very impressive in the press conference.
Bo January 19, 2013 at 12:03 am
After I watched Chip Kelly's press conference, I gotta say I've changed my tune a bit and feel a little better. Heck it's easy to sense and hear that he's quite personable and real, there's no facade it seems. Andy sent him a text message before that press conference and told him to be himself and I believe that's what we got. I learned yesterday he was a bachelor, wherein it kinda sounds like he wants to sleep in his office cause all he does is breath, eat and sleep football, what birds fan wouldn't like that or wanna give him a chance. As a coach I know this to be true for many young people, and I believe it also, and something Chip elaborated on in that press conference. They have a understandable desire to often be explained the 'why' of whatever you ask of them, in practice and or games. I've heard this statement from many a well known college or professional coach, in whatever TV interview, when explaining some of the differences between today's athletes and those in the recent or distant past.
Phil McConkey January 19, 2013 at 12:34 pm
All you guys who say the press conference changed you, you sound just like the 18 year old kids he recruits to Oregon and sells himself to the kids family to get the kid to sign. All the top college football programs are part coaching and huge part recruiting. I'd say you need to be more of a salesman than a coach in the top programs. Chip just closed the deal on you.
Jeem January 19, 2013 at 01:32 pm
Mike, I am not sure how to say this ...But you are a moron. You would rather have Gus Bradley???? I am not saying that Chip will necessarilly turn out better, but what credentials does Gus Bradely have as an NFL coach? Oh yeah, he yells at players on the sideline. Good credentials. Oh yeah he had that vaunted seahawk defense that simply let matt ryan and the atlanta offense move down the field in 19 seconds to with the playoff game against them. That is the guy I want coaching my team...NOT! Chip Kelly has gone 46-7 in the past 4 seasons, won with 3 different qb's, has run the ball 60% of the time in college and has won in a program that generally does not have the top recruits. The Eagles will be a fun team to watch and in my opinion, the Eagles got the best coach available. Kudos to the birds for trying to make the team better. Tell me Mike, how many oregon games did you watch in the past 2 years? Can you name any oregon players without looking them up on the internet?? Point is, you have no idea how good a coach this guy is.
ESP January 19, 2013 at 03:36 pm
Jeem, well said !!!!
Bo January 20, 2013 at 02:05 am
Gentlemen, no one here, including myself, who stated that they changed their mind after hearing that press conference said anything about how good or bad a hire he'll eventually turn out to be. I still have my reservations, but I know what I thought after seeing that press conference yesterday, his first in-front of the Philly press and fans, was a guy without any pro experience, who didn't shrink at that moment in the least, but actually rose to occasion. I think our press corp and fans are a tougher sell than whatever potential Oregon recruit you speak of. The funny fact is Kelly was well known for never getting nor seeking four and five star recruits. He is well known for maximizing the skills and talents of the lesser 1, 2 & 3 star recruits, four consecutive BCS bowl games. I think that truth speaks volumes of a coach that would rather take the challenge of coaching the lesser recruit. That's how the best coaches prove to themselves and others how good they really are. I wonder how good a coach Nick Saban would be if he didn't have a top 5 recruiting class each and every year and had to coach one of Kelly's duck teams. Chip again proved he was up for the challenge in the way he came off in the press conference, and once I did some reading I concluded that yesterday wasn't the only challenge he accepted and succeeded at with flying colors. Now will he succeed here, only time will tell. http://www.phillymag.com/eagles/2013/01/16/getting-to-know-chip-kelly/
Bo January 20, 2013 at 04:08 am
Hey Jeem how many college coaches with no prior experience as an assistant in the league, have been hired to be a head coach of an NFL team, in the past say 20 yrs. Trust me that number doesn't reach double digits, wherein the success rate of that small group of coaches is one, and most of those college coaches failed miserably, with a few having a little success. So there is a very valid reason that a coordinator of one of the best defenses in the league, over the past two seasons, is far more attractive and has a greater chance for success than does Chip Kelly. Monte Kiffin, the godfather of defensive coordinators, has raved about him and his prospects for success if he was given an opportunity to lead an NFL team. We have no possible way to predict the success of either coach mentioned here, but the numbers don't lie, wherein the chances of success are far greater when a coach with any previous experience in the league gets hired to be a head coach as opposed to one that doesn't. My point to you is, as I feel and hope the same, but how do you know that the Eagles will be a fun team to watch next year.
Porterincollingswood January 20, 2013 at 01:38 pm
Yes - but does that mean that Chip is an expert at finding guys who fit his system? And if his system doesn't work...we're stuck in the kind of situation I mentioned in my first post? Guys who, if put in a conventional system, can't measure up? Like a squad of Jason Babins.
I admit my bias. I've seen the Wide 9 and the Run-n-Shoot fail, and the Wildcat get quickly figured out. So I'm averse to gimmicky philosophies.
Jeem January 20, 2013 at 02:56 pm
They were looking at bilick, mike Nolan and ken wisenhunt....I am glad they hired Kelly.
Jeem January 20, 2013 at 02:57 pm
And Bo, the game is changing.,,while your point about college coaches not panning out over history is correct. However, 2 recent examples (harbaugh and Carroll) have worked out just fine
@xxLouA January 20, 2013 at 03:13 pm
anayway you look at it. MV has to go but Chip had a converse with him yesterday and it went well, he also said that the dogman would fit well....But he said he knows Nick and loves the way he plays. Dogman has to go, is Lurie and his crew that screwed up.....things have to be tried out....maybe that will be the 10% his guy talks about.... good luck with more waiting to find out, to me that's all BS...
Mike Diviney January 20, 2013 at 05:20 pm
Yeah, you can't take too much out of a press conference, but I given it was really the first time fans were meeting him, I liked what I heard.
Mike Diviney January 20, 2013 at 05:25 pm
Nor do you. Without looking it up, I know Oregon is not in the NFL. You're saying Bradley doesn't have credentials as an NFL coach. That's funny, given your support of college lifer Chip Kelly. The Seahawks D was the NUMBER 1 defense in the NFL over the 16 game season. Beyond that, not sure who you are or what YOUR credentials are in hiring NFL HC's, but no one is a moron for having an opinion and certainly you're not in a position to call anyone a moron. I hope Kelly's the next Lombardi- we'll see.
Mike Diviney January 20, 2013 at 05:29 pm
Well said Bo. Given that it was his 1st press conference, we were going to get a first impression of him... and it was positive for what it's worth.
Mike Diviney January 20, 2013 at 05:30 pm
Carroll is in his THIRD NFL Head Coaching position. Harbaugh played in the NFL for 14 years. Get a clue!
Mike Diviney January 20, 2013 at 05:31 pm
You conveniently leave out Bradley, the guy they were closest to hiring? Why?
Porterincollingswood January 20, 2013 at 06:05 pm
Pat Shurmer named OC.
Dynasty!
Jeem January 20, 2013 at 07:25 pm
They both implemented a college style approach and it is working. That is my point. How do you know Bradley's success was not as a result of Carrol? He is defensive minded head coach. It is easy to look at the potential downside aspects to Kelly's hire. That is what the average blog writer does. (Ok, I may be giving you too much credit). The fact of the matter is there is a lot to like about this hire and I for one is optimistic about the change. We can't be any worse than we have been the past 2 years.
Jeem January 20, 2013 at 07:26 pm
Sorry should have said am optimistic...typo!
Bo January 21, 2013 at 02:15 am
this is Carroll third stint in the NFL, his first was with New England back in the Mid 90's, then the Jets shortly after that. Harbaugh was a starting QB in the league who played for the Bears and almost took a Colts team to the Super Bowl in '95, so sure he wasn't a coach in the NFL but he had a substantial history. Kelly has no history, that is the key point, and how rare it is to hire a guy with no history is what I am pointing too. Take the Bills new coach, Doug Marone, he happened to be a player for a short time in the leagues, but was the Saints OC for 3 yrs before taking the head job at Syracuse. Mike Reilly, was one of the few I remember who I know hadn't had any experience in the league before he was hired away from Oregon St in the late 90's by the Chargers and I know that didn't last long cause he's back at Oregon State.
Jeem January 21, 2013 at 03:09 am
One college coach with no nfl coaching experience is in the Super Bowl. Imagine that
Mike Diviney January 21, 2013 at 04:42 am
Dude, who are you to criticize my opinion of the hire. I don't mind if you disagree, but state your own dissenting opinion, don't dismiss mine. I is optimistic about the change, I'm just not sure they got the right guy. I'm not in favor of "anyone" besides the guy we had. I hope he succeeds, but he's got a lot to overcome given that he has no NFL experience. It's a concern and to not acknowledge that is foolish.
Mike Diviney January 21, 2013 at 04:43 am
I guess you're just going to ignore his 14 year NFL career? I watch the entire NFL very closely, but I guess I missed Chip's playing career.
Mike Diviney January 21, 2013 at 04:44 am
I like the Shurmur hire. He's got NFL experience- as a HC. He also has Philly experience which can only help. Plus, Kelly's going to run the framework of the offense for the most part I would imagine. The much more important hire is the DC.
Bo January 21, 2013 at 04:48 am
Which one, John was our special teams coach before he took the Ravens job and we've already spoke about Jim here.
Jeem January 21, 2013 at 11:26 am
You can make a case for negativity no matter who the birds hired. I personally would like to give the guy a chance before I determine he is the "wrong fit." Let him coach at least a couple games before making that statement. Your point was that Kelly has no nfl coaching experience. Well Jim did not either and John was a ST coach. Both were unconventional hires. Much like Chip.
Jeem January 21, 2013 at 11:28 am
And I am happy they did not hire the other options. The only guy I would say I might have considered more was Bradley. But he is no lock to be great either.
Mike Diviney January 21, 2013 at 09:57 pm
Again, there's no sense in me writing a piece saying, I will give my opinion on Chip Kelly after I see how he does. I qualified it enough by saying I'm giving it a chance and I think he's got a chance, I'd just prefer a guy with NFL experience.
Mike Diviney January 21, 2013 at 09:58 pm
Agreed that Bradley is the only other candidate I really liked and no there are no locks until they've done it.
Bo January 21, 2013 at 10:25 pm
When Jim Harabagh asks which 9ers player, and however he'll ask or demand these players to do whatever in practice and or games there is an all important built in level of respect because he's successfully played the game at NFL level, and all his players know that. This is simply the culture of the sport, this league, where grown men get paid great money to play a very physically demanding sport. This isn't college football, where the threshold for pain and pushing your physical limits has lower expectations. Chip will never have that so in a sense he has to be that much better a communicator and an Xs and Os guy, cause he could much more quickly be shut out by whatever players, using whatever tactics he uses to motivate and teach. Jim Harbaugh, DID have HC experience before leading Stanford to 1 maybe 2 BCS games. Least we forget that however good Jim Harbaugh was, and though he might not have been the best HC in his first go-around, Mike Singletary played an important part in shaping, disciplining and molding that team to then arrive at what appears to be a bit more of a players coach in Jim Harbaugh. There's the converse a guy who was so good, better than Jim, that his personal expectations of what success is and how to achieve it, will never coincide with his players. Once Mike finds that balance he'll come back a better HC or DC.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ed B June 19, 2013 at 10:13 am
Tornator ??? Maybe that's why. Sirens didn't recognize it.