patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices

New Jersey's Fracking Moratorium Has EXPIRED! State Now Vulnerable to Fracking and Fracking Waste

Yesterday the one year moratorium on natural gas drilling using hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, in New Jersey has come to end.  The moratorium went into effect last year after Governor Christie conditionally vetoed an outright ban on fracking within the state to a one year suspension.  Governor Christie also vetoed the Fracking Waste Ban Bill that was approved by the Legislature this past year, leaving New Jersey vulnerable to the drilling process itself and the wastes produced by fracking.

As the moratorium on fracking for gas ended, environmental leaders including Sierra Club, came together to call on the Legislature and Governor to protect us from the dangers of fracking, starting with an override of the Governor’s veto of the Frack Waste Ban Bill which is urgently needed to prevent frack waste from being disposed of in the state. 

Tracy Carluccio, Deputy Director, Delaware Riverkeeper Network noted the Governor's conditional veto has "exposed all of us and our drinking water to the risks of pollution that fracking brings by removing all the reasonable and essential safeguards the Legislature enacted to protect us.  A big “Dump Here” sign has been hung on New Jersey by Governor Christie, throwing all caution to the wind. We call on our legislators to start to put things right by voting to override the Governor’s senseless veto of the Frack Waste Ban Bill." 

The expiration of the fracking moratorium comes four months after the Governor vetoed the fracking waste ban bill.  The legislation passed with overwhelming bipartisan support. Fracking waste presents an immediate threat to New Jersey as instate facilities have already been documented as accepting fracking wastewater, sludges, and drill cuttings.  This legislation is the only way to keep the toxic waste from being disposed of in New Jersey.  With the expiration of the moratorium, overriding the Governor’s veto of this bill is the first action the Legislature should take in advancing protections for New Jerseyans against fracking.   

Fracking waste contains hundreds of contaminants, including dangerous chemicals and radioactive compounds. By an exemption from federal law, the gas industry is not required to disclose all the chemicals used in the process, and with these unknown additives it is impossible to know the full threat fracking waste presents or how to fully and safely treat the waste.  Toxic pollutants that reside in the deep gas-bearing rock are dislodged and regurgitated by the fracking process, adding even more health hazards to the waste that is produced – a chemical stew that even the federal government hasn’t figured out how to safely treat. The Frack Waste Ban Bill would have prevented fracking waste from being discharged, treated and disposed of in New Jersey.  

Jim Walsh of Food & Water Watch reminded us all how important action on fracking waste and fracking is in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy.  He noted, "Hurricane Sandy provides us a grim reminder of why we need to move away from extreme energy sources like fracking that are perpetuating climate change while threatening drinking water, public health, and the environment. Christie had two opportunities to lead New Jersey away from this risky and dangerous industry, but instead he caved to pressure from the oil and gas companies, vetoing New Jersey's fracking waste ban and New Jersey's permanent ban on fracking.  We need the legislature to move and lead where the Governor continues to fail by overriding the Governor's veto of the fracking waste ban and then moving to ban fracking permanently in New Jersey."

During Hurricane Sandy over 20% of New Jersey’s wastewater treatment facilities failed, spewing raw and partially treated waste into New Jersey’s waterways.  Stormwater can also flood the pipes entering treatment plants causing combined sewer overflows with hazardous materials entering waterways.  If we allow fracking waste to be dumped and treated in New Jersey that waste could also potentially be discharged without proper treatment, reaching our waterways in such ways during a weather event.  This is especially dangerous in light of a recent Stony Brook University study that found that the biggest threat to drinking water supplies from the fracking process came from the disposal of waste water. 

The New Jersey Environmental Federation’s Dave Pringle addressed fracking’s climate change impacts stating,"Fracking will increase our addiction to dirty fossil fuels. We don't want its spoils in our water, its exhaust in our lungs, and its contribution climate disruption no the least of which is more frequent and severe weather like Sandy.

In his conditional veto of the ban bill, Governor Christie directed the DEP to investigate the adverse air and water impacts of fracking but there is no final deadline for the report.  Environmental groups have criticized the DEP’s fracking study due to its lack of transparency.  There have been no public hearings or public involvement in the investigation.  No study scope was announced.  The state study is being done while the US EPA continues to examine fracking through a very public process, with their results and recommendations expected in 2014.  

At the event Michael Pisauro with NJ Environmental Lobby addressed these problems with the DEP report saying, “This administration started with a promise of transparency and bipartisanship.  On the issue of fracking this administration has failed.  It failed to act in a bipartisan manner when it vetoed the fracking ban and the fracking waste ban the last year.  It has been anything but transparent in its development of the fracking study.  NJ deserves clean water and a healthy environment both which are put in jeopardy by the administration’s failure to act in the best interest of the state.” 

Governor Christie has failed to protect the people of New Jersey from the dangers of fracking.  Instead of having a ban on the drilling practice, we are seeing the moratorium end.  Instead of stopping the disposal of fracking waste in New Jersey, the Governor vetoed the bill.  We deserve stronger leadership on this issue and better protections in place, especially in the wake of Hurricane Sandy which showed just how vulnerable our treatment plants and landfills are.  The first step to better protecting ourselves from fracking is overriding veto on the fracking waste ban.

Valerie

2:11 pm on Friday, January 18, 2013

We need to stop the idea of fracking before anything gets started.

Reply

~Barb~

2:31 pm on Friday, January 18, 2013

Fracking gets into our drinking water, and its waste products are toxic. For those two reasons I am against it. But do us all a favor and cut the climate change crap already. Fracking DOES NOT impact the weather!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe R

10:13 am on Monday, January 21, 2013

Weather is different from climate. Please don't confuse the two.

Comment_arrow

Linda Baum

3:15 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013

Extraction techniques release methane, a greenhouse gas 25 times more potent than carbon dioxide.

Comment_arrow

Joe

3:17 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013

And cows also release methane gas, so what's your point? I take it you are anti-fracking?

Comment_arrow

Joe

8:56 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013

Fracking is being used today in New Jersey with no harm to the environment.

Comment_arrow

Jack N. Coke

5:13 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013

when the arbs finally start nuking each other you babies will be begging for fracking.

George Clark

2:32 pm on Friday, January 18, 2013

another enviromental disaster we the people are failing to stop for the love of money.

Reply

Leslie Marchun

5:16 pm on Friday, January 18, 2013

Frack off. They tax us to hell, take away our firearms and pollute our environment. Why do we stand for this?!?!?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe R

10:15 am on Monday, January 21, 2013

Who took your guns away? Nobody is talking about gun confiscation. Another gun nut paranoid obsessed loony.

S K

5:30 pm on Friday, January 18, 2013

As soon as we are all ready to give up all the benefits we receive from low cost power and petro chemical products ( zip loc bags, medical devices, gas, tires, shoe soles, you know, small stuff like that), there will be change. Oh, not ready to walk, ride your bike, have a horse and buggy, then you are not ready for chnage that will make a difference. China and India are pumping out waste at rates we did not see during the industrial revelotion.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe R

11:28 am on Saturday, January 19, 2013

Horses were not exactly pollution free but I digress.

Comment_arrow

Jack N. Coke

5:15 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Hopefully there will be global warming and the ice caps will melt and only the 1% will be able to survive on cruise ships and we can start over without the rest of you.

jerseyswamps

8:17 am on Saturday, January 19, 2013

According to Mr. Tittel our very existence on earth is a danger to mother earth. Seriously, is there anything about our existence worth preserving? It's almost a religion. We are born with this original sin of polluting. Instead of celebrating a human birth it's "oh, look. Another polluter, another strain on earth".

Reply
Comment_arrow

Eric Sauder

8:10 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013

Unfortunately it is true. The earth is suffering from the ascent of man.

Comment_arrow

Jack N. Coke

5:15 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Man cannot hurt earth you and this jabroni tittel are egotists to think such nonsense.

Joe R

9:40 am on Saturday, January 19, 2013

While troglodytes mock and deny climate change, ridicule any efforts to reduce pollution and littering, a country like Germany is working overtime to not only wean itself off of fossil fuels but also nuclear energy. It won't happen over night, it will take decades but at least it has taken the big step to phase out nuclear power and to drastically reduce their reliance on fossil fuels. Meanwhile back in the USA all we hear is drill baby drill and climate change is just a joke, blah, blah, blah. Autos have been made much less polluting, let's keep working on that, we have hybrid cars and electric cars. bd seems to be saying we should do nothing just keep on doing what we have been doing; his attitude is give up, shut up and do nothing.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Paul J. DiBartolo

12:06 pm on Saturday, January 19, 2013

Meanwhile Germany counts on us, yea, that's right, the good ole US-of-A, to have their back...but it won't matter long because Germany will soon become an Islamic country complete with Sharia Law (we, on the other hand, will bankrupt ourselves into oblivion and irrelevance) and then all the good Germans can count on Al-Qaeda to watch their back.
BTW, I'm still looking for all those people who "ridicule any efforts to reduce pollution and littering." Boy, you must be a legend in your own mind, Joe R., but I guess somebody has to do it.

Comment_arrow

Jack N. Coke

5:16 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013

You are socialist facist anti-semite.

Monk

9:41 am on Saturday, January 19, 2013

Why is "Kumbaya" running through my head?

Reply

Joe R

10:07 am on Saturday, January 19, 2013

We can't flip a switch and eliminate all plastics overnight we have to do it a step at a time. Using fewer plastic bags would help but the attitude of the climate change deniers is that if you can't eliminate all plastics right now immediately then why bother, it's just a joke. Of course I am dependent on the electrical grid, plastics and fossil fueled transportation. Does that mean we should do nothing and make no efforts to reduce pollution? The climate change mockers expect a 100% change to renewable energy and non-plastics in a few months or else do nothing. This is a long term project that will take many decades. Instead of mocking the efforts of so called tree huggers, why not offer some good ideas to reduce pollution and littering.

Reply
Comment_arrow

jerseyswamps

11:23 am on Saturday, January 19, 2013

So we should wean ourselves away from plastic. Go back to more "natural" products. OK. Like wood and products from wood. Then please tell Father Tittel to stop preaching we should use PLASTIC for boardwalks! Wood WILL break down and return to nature when it washes out to sea. Not plastic. Plastic boardwalks will break down into tiny bits and be ingested by marine life. We keep hearing about all this floating waste, mostly plastic, in our oceans. Sea animals ingesting plastic bags. How about sea creatures that consume plankton?

Comment_arrow

wookfish

7:13 am on Monday, January 21, 2013

fricken tree huggers can't make up their collective minds...save a tree use plastic bags....what's their next idea?

Comment_arrow

Darren Gladden

1:00 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Wish patch had a like button ...Wookfish that was awesome
comeback

Occupy Reality

5:56 pm on Saturday, January 19, 2013

Your attention is being diverted from really important matters!!! Before any hydraulic fracturing for petroleum products can occur in New Jersey, you would need to lease gas rights and more importantly secure a drilling permit. There are literally years of permitting and environmental impact statements need before any fracking would occur. WAKE UP the left and right are diverting your attention from more important issues. Oh yeah, check the geology of NJ and realize there is little of the Marcellus shale in the state to frack.

Reply

Joe

6:53 pm on Saturday, January 19, 2013

Fracking is a brilliant engineering process that is a testament to Man's ingenuity. It has been used for decades without consequence. The anti-fracking movement is brought to you by guys like Tittel who would have us all living in caves if they could. We need more gas and oil, especially from the US and we need it now. When all those wonderful alternative fuels are ready fine, but until then, our vast supplies of oil and natural gas are ready for the taking.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jack N. Coke

5:17 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013

tittel doesnt care about the environment or caves - he is a leech - he has nothing to produce - he cannot get a real job - he needs to live off this hysteria.

Eyeballs

8:15 am on Monday, January 21, 2013

Let's get crackin with frackin........ thank God we can now start using this safe, clean and efficient means of obtaiing energy. Hey Jeff, move on to your next thing to wring your hands over.

Reply

Ric

10:15 am on Monday, January 21, 2013

Sorry Jeff but thanks to your misguided attack last week on plastic grocery bags I have lost my fervor that was for environmental issues.
Fracking is helping this country recover economically from the disastrous policies of the Dubya administration. By 2010 we will become the world leader in energy production – producing more energy than even Saudi Arabia. Fracking has created hundreds of thousands of new jobs and given us an abundance of natural gas. From this abundance, in the last four years ago, the price of natural gas from PSE&G has dropped form an all-time high back to 2002 prices. Because of the low prices, it is attracting manufacturing companies to build new plants in the USA. Jeff, you have a job so you don’t care about the millions of unemployed Americans but I do.
It certainly appears that you would truly prefer for all of to live the stark existence of my grandparents who were poor sharecroppers. They had no modern conveniences and cooked on fires that burned kindling wood found on the ground and wove their own clothes. That does not appeal to me.

Reply

Marie Sheehan Boljen

12:42 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013

Get your facts straight. Fracking typically occurs HUNDREDS, if not THOUSANDS of feet BELOW the water table where your drinking water is located. You need to understand the process, and not blindly listen to Hollywood types who don't have a clue. This process has been in place for over FIFTY years....never has it affected drinking water.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dan Reynolds

12:53 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013

Your are correct, however in the process of "bringing up" the gas, the well casings crack and fail, and leech the frack water byproducts into the drink water table.

Sounds like _you_ don't understand the process.

While the process has been around, it was only since the "Haliburton Loophole" (where fracking is not 2005 energy act) that it was exploited and now that horizontal wellbores are easier to generate than vertical ones.

See it in the ENERGY POLICY ACT OF 2005. Go to Page 102, Section 322. HYDRAULIC FRACTURING.

And like my friends out in CO. It has completely effected their drinking water.

Can't drink money.. right?

Comment_arrow

Linda Baum

3:48 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013

Contamination of water supplies occurs a number of ways. One, when the casings are pulled back up from drilling depths, bypassing the water table. Two, from seepage through fissures in the earth. And then there are spills and seepage from surface ponds holding the waste and toxins that vollatize to the air and settle on land and water. The entire process is highly pollutive and highly problematic. The failure rate for the casings, over time, is 100%, and that's the gas industry's own statistic. There is nothing safe about this process, nor has it been in place for fifty years, as you suggest. Fracking techniques, as we know them today, have only been used since about 1999.

If you haven't seen the 18-minute video "The Sky is Pink", I recommend it: http://vimeo.com/44367635

Comment_arrow

Joe

5:15 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013

ms. Baum, as a liberal Democrat it stands to reason that you would be against anything that would increase the supply of natural gas. However, the video you point to is just another Al Gore-esque piece of left wing, anti-oil/natural gas industry propaganda. In the meantime, energy prices keep going up, demand is going up and supplies are shrinking. We need more natural gas and oil and fracking is just one proven tool with which to get it.

Comment_arrow

Jack N. Coke

5:19 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013

After algore sold his tv station that he only acquired due to his political connections - he sold it to al qeda for a cool 100Mil to increase his carbon footprint and ocean front homes and private jets - I am sure he owns oil and gas companies and will sell them after the arabs nuke themselves.

Cindy Pierson

12:58 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013

You need to get your facts straight Marie - It has ALWAYS affected drinking water, and will continue to impact our health, all for about 5 years worth of natural gas from the PA shale. I guess if you don't live there, you think you don't need to care. but if you are among the 15 million people who get their water from the Delaware River watershed, you should care. go to the Delaware Riverkeeper website or watch "Gasland" if you don't want your info from "hollywood types".

Reply

Monk

1:08 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013

I heard that, to date, the EPA has not found any drinking water with contaminants from fracking in excess of what is permitted.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Monk

5:36 am on Wednesday, January 23, 2013

"Detections in drinking water wells are generally below established health and safety standards."
http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/0/EF35BD26A80D6CE3852579600065C94E

Marie Sheehan Boljen

1:42 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013

That's right, Monk! This is a totally manufactured crisis.

Reply

Joe R

2:13 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013

The people who live in the areas where there are oil wells, deep water oil rigs, coal mines, mountain top removal and fracking are the ones really suffering for our addiction to fossil fuels. There are coal mine fires that have been going on for more than 50 years, it doesn't affect us in NJ but it sure did affect the people in the little town of Centralia, PA. Centralia is a borough and ghost town in Columbia County, Pennsylvania. Its population has dwindled from over 1,000 residents in 1981 to 10 in 2010, as a result of a mine fire burning beneath the borough since 1962. We are stuck with fossil fuels for a long time, all the more reason to work harder developing renewable energy. Instead, the Fox News and CNBC crowd are screaming for more oil and more drilling and more digging and more despoiling of the environment.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dentss Dunnagun

3:58 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013

To frack or not to frack ....oil scarcity is going to have a way of making that choice for us. Lets stop acting l like reality is elective

Comment_arrow

Joe

5:33 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013

Gee, what did liberals do before Fox News? Not much fun having the most popular cable channel NOT towing the far left, liberal Democrat propaganda line, is it?

Mike

5:37 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013

Drill baby drill. Frack baby frack. Money, not enviromental BS makes the world go round. Drilling, fracking, industrial development in general is as safe as we can make it. Whiners like algore, Laura and Joe R are always going to whine...turn up the volume...we won't have to listen.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Laura

6:01 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013

Well, if you, obviously, want me to make a comment, I will. The only problem I have with fracking is the fact that companies don't list all the chemicals they use to do the fracking. They call certain chemicals proprietary information. They use chemicals that are known carcinogens. If they choose to do that in the middle of Montana or North Dakota, I have no problem with that.

Thalidomide was considered safe too, until babies starting coming out with flippers for arms and legs.

According to some, Corporations are people too, but they just don't have a soul or a conscience in some cases.

People are free to not trust the government. I don't trust big business.

Opinionated

6:07 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013

Hey look at that HBO special about fracking, oh yeah it was a hoax. But they have Bill Maher, oh yeah. Having people lie for a cause is OK if you agree. Oh yeah, that sounds like something Bill Maher would say. Wonder if they get funding from OPEC?

Reply

Mister B

6:17 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013

The other problem we have is that the environmental nuts who don't want fracking (fine, I can live with that one) also want us to find alternatives. But as soon as we try to build offshore wind turbines to collect wind energy, they complain that we're spoiling the view of nature. You can't have it both ways, geniuses. If fracking is off the table, then let the wind farms be built. If you don't want the wind farms, then stop complaining that solar farms take up too much space and we're losing open land. Pick one and get on with it!

Reply

Al McDorman

7:00 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013

I only see fracking in Jersey affecting the counties.of Sussex and Warren, possibly Morris and Hunterdon, and less likely but possibly the western reaches of Passaic and Bergen unless the waste waters are dumped south and east of there. Those are also the areas with the highest record of earthquake activity which could be expected to increase given fracking, if current experiences in the midwest are relevant here. I hope fracking doesn't happen in NJ, but if it does, I'm glad I don't live in the skylands JUST as I am glad I don't live in the shorelands. At least I can watch the downward spiral from a distance.
I'm all for huge solar and wind farms but not fracking in Jersey. We can live without it, and the energy potential from wind will ONLY increase, unlike whatever natural gas supplies we might have.

Reply

Paul J. DiBartolo

10:27 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Any of you Anti-Frackers care to comment on "FrackNation" or would that make too much sense? Feel free, Jeff, if you think you possess the goods.

Reply

PrincetonIQ

6:27 am on Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Jeff Tittel's continued one-sided columns, without noting that he's executive director of the New Jersey Sierra Club, makes me less trusting of PATCH. People need to understand his bias and be left to determine what they think of his commentary in that informed context.

I won't dignify this column with facts, but suffice it to say he is against everything for his own organization's financial benefit and doesn't acknowledge or relay a balanced view on this. It's about continuing to raise money for his cause, and you can only do that if people are scared to death about fracking and a number of other issues.

Until then, readers should know the columnist doesn't have a job if people are fighting for something or against something in New Jersey, and that context should help people understand his shrill, unscientific viewpoints.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sean McCullen

11:39 am on Wednesday, January 23, 2013

http://pointpleasant.patch.com/users/jeff-tittel-a3f95261

That bio has been there for as long as Jeff has been writing as a blogger out of Point Pleasant Patch, I would assume—but don't know for certain because I have nothing to do with the day-to-day operations of Point Pleasant Patch. All you have to do is click on his name to get to his bio page. No trickery involved.

This is a blog. An opinion blog, at that. It's not a news article. Jeff's role here is to be subjective. Columnists/bloggers who tell both sides of the story (or worse, defend both sides) don't tend to be very interesting. Take Paul below here. He and I couldn't be farther apart politically or socially. He writes blogs from an extremely conservative viewpoint. They're heavily opinionated, and guess what? As blogs go, they get read. If they were not opinionated, they wouldn't get read and I wouldn't run them any longer.

Comment_arrow

Paul J. DiBartolo

12:30 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013

You've got me all wrong, Sean...I'm middle of the road, as moderate as they come. Just ask me:-)

Comment_arrow

Darren Gladden

1:05 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013

I think Sean is right about you Paul .....

Comment_arrow

PrincetonIQ

1:15 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Sean, I understand the role of opinion pieces and appreciate them. I think they should be labeled "Opinion" and a sentence of biographical information should appear at the beginning or end of the posting. That would provide more transparency.

Please note that when a blog appears on another Patch site by clicking on the name you retrieve a page of prior blog posts, not a link to the bio. From that page the user must click on another link to get to the bio. I did visit the Point Pleasant Patch site and see that clicking on the name there links to the bio, which I agree is more transparent and helpful.

Thanks for you reply.

Paul J. DiBartolo

8:14 am on Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Write the blog and run...we get it Jeff. Yes, as PrincetonIQ points out, you are the director of the NJ chapter of the Sierra Club which makes any mention of such as any type of authority on your subject worthless. Look, I've written over 50 blogs on the Patch and have essentially responded to every criticism or inquiry...and I work a full time job. So...what's your excuse?
Admittedly, I don't normally read your stuff because I've recognized from what little I have read that you're completely biased and write from a totally subjective point of view. you must think your writing is so powerful and important that nobody deserves a response. Well, at least one person thinks your writing has something to offer us...can you guess who that is, Jeff?
Actually, I don't really expect a response because I doubt you even read the comments here. When it comes to the common people of New Jersey, Jeff, your voice is essentially irrelevant, seldom rising above the noise.

Reply
Comment_arrow

agent itchy

7:29 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013

i'm so sick of seeing you spew your hate toward anything environmental. what science degree do you hold? have you read the list of chemicals used in fracking? do you know what those chemicals do to drinking water? have you ever reviewed the design plans of the disposal sites for the spent chemicals? you have absolutely no credibility.

because i know you don't like reading, Google "NASA and climate change", then click on the pretty pictures. The photo evidence is easy enough for even you to understand Paul.

SOG

10:58 am on Wednesday, January 23, 2013

wheee! let's all jump in our 12 mpg SUV's and head on out to the anti-fracking protests!
make sure you wear plenty of polyester and be sure to bring your own "spring" water in your throw away plastic bottles! oh, and be sure to leave on all the lights and your heat cranked up so your McMansion is nice and toasty when you get home and microwave yourselves a midnight snack while you stand looking out your picture window admiring your on all night landscape lighting...

Reply

Joe R

12:00 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013

@SOG, totally irrelevant. Talk to the poor folks who have had their water ruined, their lives ruined and their home values destroyed. They don't live in McMansions. They can't sell their homes and most of these people are just scraping by so they have to live under horrible conditions because of fracking. These people are desperately worried about their health and the long term consequences of being exposed to all these toxins.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Paul J. DiBartolo

12:32 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013

I watched FrackNation last night and heard and saw a totally different story than your version. can you substantiate anything you say with anything along the order of facts?

Comment_arrow

SOG

1:26 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013

what are you willing to give up for them, Joe?
what are you willing to give up to decrease the demand for petroleum products?
the economy of the United States, like it or not, was built upon and revolves around the petroleum, gas and coal industries.
have your cake? eat your cake? can't do both...
fracking sucks. so does shelling out billions to Middle Eastern regimes that hate us, but love our petro dollars. so does sitting on enough oil and gas to make us energy independent while the eco crowd cries and wrings their hands about letting the energy companys get it out of the ground. so does King Obama sending 14.4 billion dollars to foreign green energy companies that folded, not to mention the billions wasted here on Solyndra and the like.
Until Americans say enough is enough and force our own government to work with domestic businesses to move away from our petroleum addiction, this is going to go on and on and on.
We're wasting thousands of acres of green crops to make ethanol and paying $7.00 a pound for ground beef. Do you want to drive, or eat cheap hamburgers? How much petroleum is wasted every day making useless packaging, plastic auto parts, shrink wrap, printing ink, plastic knives and forks and paper plates. We're a nation of wasters with our hands out demanding more. Until we change, this is going to be the way of life.

Comment_arrow

Monk

8:27 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Here's the EPA calling Joe R a liar, liar pants on fire:

"Detections in drinking water wells are generally below established health and safety standards."
http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/0/EF35BD26A80D6CE3852579600065C94E

I have spoken

12:31 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Jeff and him fanatical band of merry men (AKA Sierra Club) will have us taxed taxed and taxed some more with their ridiculious fairy tales of mass destruction.

When is his keeper going to take away his keyboard. Jeff is truly a NUT-JOB

Reply

agent itchy

7:21 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013

watch North Dakota burn. in fact, watch it burn from space because it's now on fire from the unregulated filthy practice of flaring off natural gas (aka wasting ENERGY and generating more CO2).

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2265516/North-Dakota-oil-boom-comes-gas-fires-bright-region-space.html

what will it take to make the climate change deniers realize man's addiction to dead dinosaurs is our doom?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Paul J. DiBartolo

7:40 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013

You ever been to North Dakota in January-February? Maybe you should try living up there a while and then tell us what you really think.

Richard Chimento

12:46 am on Thursday, January 24, 2013

I'm not yet convinced of the evidence that what is happening to our climate is a direct result of our use of fossil fuels. All they really have is conjecture based on correlation they derived through limited data and computer models. Any good scientist knows that correlation doesn't equal causation, my blue jeans aren't bear repellent merely because I've never been attacked by bears while wearing them. Also it is known we are coming out of a long cooling period in earth's history, providing more proof that whats happening is actually natural. CO2 is not the worst green house gas in the world, Oxygen is actually much worse. Could our use of carbon emitting fuels be contributory to the overall climate change? Possibly, but to what degree is not known and if we all sacrificed and stopped using fossil fuels now, there is no guarantee any difference would be made other than the collapse of modern society as we know it. The alarm-ism over fracking is born from poor experimentation and the spread of misinformation, just as they did to DDT. Fracking takes place much deeper in the earth and isn't a danger to our water supply, that assumption came from experiments that weren't done at the average depth, thus its flawed.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Claire

5:29 am on Thursday, January 24, 2013

WOW ...now I know the science... thanks for the info

Claire

3:54 am on Thursday, January 24, 2013

I just can't avoid responding to a plea for help...Please Jeff and Company. Start doing what you are supposed to be doing. Worry about what the plastic will have done to the ocean by the time you finally wake up and what we are going to do with all the bottles we have and will have. If you want a more immediate goal. Think about what Sandy has done to our pets and marine life. Isn't that the goal of your club. Sometimes people have to do what they do because they have to live.

Reply
Comment_arrow

jerseyswamps

4:40 am on Thursday, January 24, 2013

Jeff and his friends should worry about plastic in our oceans? OK, that sounds like a nobel cause. But I see other letters by him pushing for the use of plastic boards in the rebuilding of boardwalks. We keep hearing climate change and more big destructive storms are the new normal. More destroyed boardwalks washing out to sea. Those plastic boards he thinks are so good for the environment will not decompose in our ocean. Real wood will decompose and return to nature. Plastic wood will break down into tiny pieces and then be ingested by sea life. How do we make sense of this?
Jeff and Company will jump onto ANY far left issue even if the issues are in conflict with each other. Like keeping plastic bags out of the environment while feeding plastic to sea life. They count on those who follow and contribute to not think, just trust them and jump on board.

Claire

5:28 am on Thursday, January 24, 2013

That is the problem in a few sentences...good analysis. They mean well but are not focused on short and long term impact. Next thing he will write an article about how we should have his elevated concrete boardwalk. The design is off on that too. without going into the cost. I shudder when I remember what they did to the lumber industry when they tried to protect the North American spotted owl. I should have remembered that.

Reply

Claire

6:20 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

I love the line:
let's address the three horsemen of the climate apocalypse...
really wish I wrote that.... great content

Reply

Leave a comment

The Collingswood Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks