Sobriety Checkpoint Coming Aug. 17-18
The state-funded policing initiative makes roadways safer, says the Camden County Prosecutor's Office.
Collingswood police have been approved for a DWI checkpoint next weekend somewhere in the borough limits, according to a release from the Camden County Prosecutor's Office.
The police action is funded by state grant money.
"High visibility, efficiency of enforcement, and media attention have made checkpoints an effective tool in removing impaired drivers from the roadway, helping dramatically reduce the number of DUI arrests in recent years," read a statement issued by Jason Loughlin, a spokesman for the office.
The primary goal of every traffic stop is deterrence, Anthony J. Vecchio, a Freehold, NJ lawyer who specializes in DUI defense, told Patch over Memorial Day weekend.
"Checkpoints also give police a great opportunity to write summons for document issues like expired driver's licenses and registrations—resulting in a surge of revenue for the state," Vecchio told Patch in an e-mail at the time.
Vecchio noted then that the most common arrests by far are for suspected drunken driving, outstanding warrants and marijuana possession, and that with information given out ahead of time, surprise is no longer an acceptable legal defense.
Joe
1:10 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
When should "surprise" EVER be an acceptable legal defense? "I know I was breaking the law and risking the lives of innocent people through my selfish and incredible stupid action but I was really surprised that the police had a check point set up so I should be let go". Mr. Vecchio should be so proud that he is able to keep these scumbags on the street.
Matt Skoufalos
2:48 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
To be fair Joe, I hear your point, but let's not shoot the messenger. Mr. Vecchio's comments initially were made to Patch on the subject of Click It or Ticket safety belt traffic stops; as they were applicable here I re-ran them for the sake of context.
Wikipedia has a concise little write-up on the 4th Amendment implications of search and seizure as they apply to this practice, which is where the "surprise" defense originates, I believe:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Random_checkpoint#Legality_in_the_United_States
Gabe Fletcher
3:23 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
They see me Rollin... they Haten'......
Timber
1:54 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012
You are not required to engage in any conversation with the checkpoint operators.
It's all voluntary.
Your obligations when you are seized within a suspicion-less checkpoint is to Stop, provide any necessary requested documentation, ask politely when you are free to go. You are under no obligation to engage in conversation with the operators. You do NOT have to answer their questions.