patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Collingswood Resident Wants to Dim Light Pollution

Collingswood resident Suzanne Cloud thinks the borough should consider a 'light trespass' ordinance to control luminous pollution.

 

When she goes outside at night, Collingswood resident Suzanne Cloud looks up at the sky and is disappointed.

"Maybe you can see Orion, and maybe you can see The Big Dipper, but you probably can’t see the Pleiades, and you probably can’t see Beetlejuice," she says, "because it’s just too bright."

As a child, Cloud beheld the arc of the Milky Way in the darkness over Pennsauken. Nowadays, she said, a hazy flood of lights from businesses, shopping centers and overanxious security timers spills out.

"We’re competing with Philadelphia, that’s to be sure, but we’re also creating our own pollution," Cloud said.

At the December 2012 meeting of the borough commissioners, Cloud spoke up to invite Collingswood leaders to consider a "light trespass law," citing the International Dark-Sky Association as a likely source for language.

The ominously named agency advocates for communities to redirect their man-made lighting and to use less of it:

Human-produced light pollution not only mars our view of the stars; poor lighting threatens astronomy, disrupts ecosystems, affects human circadian rhythms, and wastes energy to the tune of $2.2 billion per year in the U.S. alone.

"All you have to do is drive around town some night," Cloud said. "Everybody’s got big, bright, luminous security lights. If you just look where they’re shining, bathing a neighbor’s house in light, bathing the yards in light; if you train yourself to notice it, it’ll freak you out."

Cloud said she's not in favor of a town plunged into darkness, but just wishes people could learn to install their security lights properly and purchase systems of appropriate luminosity. A light trespass ordinance could not only restore some of the necessary shade to Collingswood's night sky, but it might possibly help save a few bucks on electric bills, she said.

"I just think an ordinance would be good for people to have some recourse when things are just too bright," Cloud said. "You can’t have a business that has a big flashing sign out front.

"It’s something that I’d like the town to have a conversation about."

Check out the lighting code handbook produced by Dark Skies above, and tell us in the comments if you think Collingswood could benefit from a light trespass ordinance.

  • Does Collingswood need a light trespass ordinance?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes - It's a quality of life issue that could be corrected by some simple adjustments.
        11 (23%)
    • No - It's not a concern for me as things are now.
        28 (60%)
    • I don't know, but it's worth exploring.
        7 (15%)
    Total votes: 46
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Dark Skies, Light Pollution, Light Trespass, and Suzanne Cloud

John Medero

7:04 am on Monday, February 18, 2013

Yeah my pic made the front page :)

Reply

Aileen

7:09 am on Monday, February 18, 2013

Outside lights deter crime at night. Would not support a measure to limit their use in any way.

Reply

Kevin

7:14 am on Monday, February 18, 2013

If anything I think we need more lights on the streets. Try going to the corner of Woodlawn and Maple and making a right turn onto Maple on a 1/2 cloudy night. You can barely see if there is anyone standing on the corner. There are so few street lights in this town minus Haddon Avenue. Take a look at some of the interior blocks it is as dark as the country in the middle of Madison or Knight Ave. It is dark.

As someone who has had numerous things stolen from our backyard over our 13 years, lights do make a difference. Since the lights have been installed covering our backyard nothing has gone missing. Maple Ave and all other roads that run parallel to Haddon become the road of choice for junkies, thieves, etc who are looking to make a quick score. Unless more street lights are put up, we don't need a law governing how much light we can shine on our own property.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Suzanne Cloud

8:48 am on Monday, February 18, 2013

Kevin,
I understand what you're saying, but what if the bright light shining on your property is not YOUR bright light?

Comment_arrow

Kevin

9:23 am on Monday, February 18, 2013

Suzanne, I see where that can be a nuisance to some. For the most part, I want light on my backyard at night, and if my neighbor wants to contribute through his electricity bill, that is ok with me.

What has your neighbor said when you approached him about it? Not being an ordinance against it shouldn't stop an officer from talking to your neighbor if it is shining through your windows at night.

Aeroflyte

7:16 am on Monday, February 18, 2013

Really? This is newsworthy? I can see it now. The Collingswood police inspecting the number and wattage of porch lights. Get a grip Ms. Cloud.

Reply

Sean Andrew

7:38 am on Monday, February 18, 2013

Am I the only one who thinks it is GREAT that a woman opposed to light is named Cloud? I support stars and saving energy and lower electric bills, but am not in favor of the government getting more involved in micromanaging my life.

Reply

Suzanne Cloud

7:57 am on Monday, February 18, 2013

It's unfortunate that the reporter chowse a headline that frames my debate this way. Dark Skies equal rampanmt crime. I'm NOT in favor of making people less safe. I DO believe that there are ways to direct lighting better to make everyone feel safe AND give us a sky full of stars. Also, I'll ask everyone. How would you feel if your neighbor had a very bright security light that he refused to adjust. So this bright security light is on ALL the time and your backyard is almost constantly bathed in bright light, forcing you to abandon any night-time activities on your property in summer, keep your shades constantly down - closing yourself in to escape your neighbor's security lights. Wouldn't you like some kind of ordinance so you could address this sort of light trespass?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Collingswoodnative

8:08 am on Monday, February 18, 2013

The brightest place in town is Stokes and Lees Ave. The lights in front of the Collingswood B of E entrance in Zane North School shine for blocks, it's as bright as being at Citizens Bank Park for a Phillies game.

Take a drive past sometime, you'll agree.

Comment_arrow

Jill Warner

11:10 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Do you know there is another near me that has a problem with the storm drains because he live at the bottom of a street shaped like a u but no-one cares because it is not them...I am so sorry for you...they just don't care

Aileen

8:03 am on Monday, February 18, 2013

Just because you are having difficulty with your neighbor, does not mean that there should be bright light legislation for the entire town. I think you need to deal with your neighbor. Personally, I love how dark it is here. Much better than when we lived in Philly.

Reply

Suzanne Cloud

8:22 am on Monday, February 18, 2013

Aileen, so what would you suggest to deal with a neighbor who is not interested in how their neighbors feel after many requests to stop his light trespass? Without some kind of ordinance, there is no recourse for someone who's property is being devalued because of this. If a neighbor decides they want to raise pigs in their back yard, there is an ordinance to stop them. This is basically the same thing.

Plus, just take a drive around town at night and see....it's so bright you cannot see the stars. Don't you want to see the stars?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jill Warner

11:10 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

GOOD LUCK,IT'S ALL ABOUT THEMSELVES

Jim Miller

8:26 am on Monday, February 18, 2013

I think compromises must be made...just because you (or your electrician) have installed a motion-detector spotlight, that is not the end of the job. These things are adjustable in brightness, directional aim, and duration. I think a lot of people just wire them up and don't do any finessing, so they're on at full blast all the time.

Reply

Aileen

8:32 am on Monday, February 18, 2013

In all honesty, it wouldn't bother me, I'd feel that much safer at night. As regards to viewing the nighttime sky, we get a great view.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Suzanne Cloud

8:50 am on Monday, February 18, 2013

So, your argument is everything is okay on your block, so who cares about anyone else? How is that promoting the "general welfare"?

Comment_arrow

Ryan Cochrane

11:30 am on Monday, February 18, 2013

Suzanne you are essentially saying the same thing. Everything is NOT okay at your household, so who cares about anyone else?

Lori

8:36 am on Monday, February 18, 2013

Isn't this two different issues? 1. Overall use of public and commercial lighting = can't see enough stars. 2. Residents who have bright security lights that may make neighbors feel uncomfortable in their own homes = can't sleep in your own bedroom.
As for #1, I don't think anything will be done - it's part of the flavor and security of the town - sorry this is an age where the stars may be hard to find. As for #2 - yes, perhaps we need to look at this if there are complaints of this nature.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Suzanne Cloud

8:53 am on Monday, February 18, 2013

Thanks for your reasoned comment Lori...you're right, it IS two issues, but I don't agree they can be as cleanly separated as you have here. I think they are deeply related. I don't want to give up the stars I saw as a child. I want my grandson to see them from his backyard. We CAN do something about this and still be perfectly safe.

Ed B

10:44 am on Monday, February 18, 2013

OMG...are you people serious? The World of Camden is right up the street & all you have to worry about is whether or not you can see the Big Dipper outside your house.
Go to a planetarium.
At least if you were going to fight about bright lights let it be the headlights that have gotten way out of control.

Reply

Phil McConkey

10:44 am on Monday, February 18, 2013

So a couple neighbors turning off their porch light is going to cut down on light so we can see the stars? Suzanne, I think it's great you want your grandson to see the stars but we live 4 miles from the 5th largest city. (Please see satellite map of the NE at night). Getting 10 neighbors to turn there 45 Watt bulb off is not going to allow you to see Pluto
http://www.ouramazingplanet.com/3001-northeast-lights-satellite-image.html

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ryan Cochrane

11:30 am on Monday, February 18, 2013

This was exactly what I was going to say.

gurb

11:30 am on Monday, February 18, 2013

Are we going to ask Philadelphia to turn their lights off?thats the only way we'll see stars.

Reply

Cheryl

11:30 am on Monday, February 18, 2013

Listen , she just wants the town to talk about it.... But I have to agree to some extent my neighbor lights there whole back yard up at night , which is there right however their lights light up the whole back side of my house and in my bedroom window at night . Getting people to learn to install lighting properly can't be a bad idea can it ???

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jill Warner

1:23 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

I agree, some people should at least feel bad for her plight. neighbors suck sometimes and maybe this was just her way of trying to get attention for her issue.go to the bottom of Lees LANE at newton creek and come up lees LANE and the back of Froggies house looks like a circus is going on....now it doesn't bother me it is just an observation but if I lived there I would be pissed.

ally gobi

12:12 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

I support you, Suzanne.
I'm not sure about legislation as an answer but I am open to options.

Darkness exists with reason, and as far as the circadian rhythm is concerned, a very good reason. Despite feeling unaffected by light pollution, you might be surprised how better rested you feel after a night in complete darkness. Heavy curtains are the best defense for this.

But the issue is tricky. Crime is a problem. Aren't all the world's problems equally if not more convoluted? Let's thank the brave among us for making 'controversial' arguments. This could change our lives in ways so subtle it's hard to imagine the benefits. Which makes it equally subtle to understand. Change is not easy, does not take one person, and isn't completed overnight.

Let's all continue to be open-minded, and at the very least: compassionate!

Reply

Paul

12:12 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

"Beetlejuice" is a movie; "Betelgeuse" is a star in the constellation Orion.

Reply

Robb C. Sewell

12:42 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

Sorry but I have to disagree with the assessment of houses and yards being bathed in lights. I love to walk and do so frequently and have never seen what Ms. Cloud describes. I mix up my walking routes all the time and have always encountered darkened streets where I have actually almost tripped a few times because of the absence of light. I also think about one morning when I left my house extra early -- in the pitch dark -- and how our garage security light came on to show a man trying to break into our neighbor's car. The man dashed off when the light came on and we saw each other. Had it not been for our light, which went off after 20 seconds, and my presence, it's quite likely our neighbor's car would have been burglarized, perhaps stolen.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jim DeSimone

4:29 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

I have to agree, Robb. Some of the streets on your side of Haddon Ave. art particularly dark at night. Some low-wattage street lights sure would help a lot. My neighbors and I have motion sensor lights, and I am thankful for them because they allow me to see my front door when I arrive at night and haven't remembered to turn lights on and they also deter criminals (and we are a town that suffers from a lot of small crime like car break-ins). It sounds like Ms. Cloud is trying to legislate her way through a conflict with her next-door neighbor. As for cloud watching, about the darkest place in town is the center of Knights Park. Ms. Cloud is welcome to go there to look at the stars, and she will find that, even there, the stars are not visible. Having grown up in a slightly less dense suburb myself, I can say that it's been many, many years since you could see all of these stars in the suburbs of NJ, and that is hardly because of porch lights.

Comment_arrow

Angelo

8:50 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

I have to agree with this myself. I recently moved here from the city and I find the streets to be very dark at night. I walk my dog at night when I come home from work and there are many areas where I cannot see the sidewalk under my feet. Not only do I feel unsafe in terms of possibly encountering crime, but I also feel vulnerable to falling. As for Wait's comment about walking around Cooper River on the "walking paths that were specifically lit for people to be able to walk at night," you assume that the only people who walk at night do it for leisure. A lot of us walk at night out of necessity and the town's sidewalks are our "walking paths". I do not drive and I depend on walking to get to the train station or any other destination. One should be able to see clearly when they walk around town. I think it is very unfortunate that some people are experiencing intrusive light in their homes; however, I do think that the town in general can use a bit more light on the sidewalks and streets where the absence of light can be hazardous. As far as spotlights in people's backyards, I would hope that people would be considerate to their neighbors when installing them, but passing a legislation to cut back on lighting up a town seems a bit extreme. As I said before, Collingswood can actually use a bit more light in my opinion.

Comment_arrow

Robb C. Sewell

9:35 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

Walt,

I'm not advocating for more lights along our streets. Rather, I accept the streets as they are and do take a light with me to illuminate my way, both on neighborhoods streets and along the walking paths at Knight Park. My point is that as I've walked through town I have not encountered what Ms. Cloud describes.

Will McGowan

1:21 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

My car was broken into during Sandy and they clearly went around the back of my house to see what else they could steal. The security light went on and scared them. Game, set, match. Sorry but if I want to see the stars, I'll google them or move away from the city. I would MUCH rather see money spent on fixing up the overgrown green space around newton Lake Park and show caseing the site like it should be. I say MORE lights for safety.

Reply

C.V.

2:01 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

i cannot believe there is an article about this.

Reply

Donna Evans

2:01 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

I'm all for more lights try living across from Knights Park when windows can be left open. Say around 2:00am and you hear kids screaming in the park . Maybe that would be a good place to look at the stars .

Reply

Elizabeth Croker

3:23 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

I don't want to see the stars when I am driving, I'd like to concentrate on the road. I'd actually be in favor for more lighting along Atlantic ave.

Reply

Joe

8:50 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

With all due respect, I find it a bit ridiculous to live in a place like Collingswood and then complain about not being able to see stars clearly at night. It is a bit like moving to Miami and then complaining about not getting any snow. We live in a highly urbanized area and light comes with that lifestyle.

Without minimizing Ms. Cloud's opinion and/or wishes, this truly strikes me as a resident having an issue with their neighbor and trying to solve that issue with new ordinances and a red herring involving not being able to enjoy nature. If stars are desired, perhaps a trip to Knight Park or Cooper River Park is in order. Both are quite dark at night and offer wide views of the nighttime sky. I certainly can sympathize with Ms. Cloud, as I am a big fan of astronomy, but I moved to Collingswood with open eyes.

Reply

Suzanne Cloud

6:52 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

After reading all of your opinions, it is a shame that most of you believe that 1.) I live in Collingswood so I should just forget about seeing a night sky of stars. 2.) It's just one neighbor being insensitive, so why should anyone care? 3.) Crime will increase if we don't have everything lit up like an airport. This is why I really wanted a discussion about this, a reasoned discussion rather than knee jerk reactions. Other towns around the country have implemented this idea with much success and turned it into a plus for a town (and saved energy money to boot). As far as living near Philly so we shouldn't expect to see any stars...not so. We won't see the Milky Way like you would in Montana, but we'd see more. Go to certain areas of Cherry Hill and see if I'm right. As far as insensitive neighbors, why would anyone want to have a someone call the police every time lights are being used as weapons...yet again, using scarce resources (the police) for problems that could be solved by a simple ordinance. And as far as crime, let's look at some studies that have been done to see if an uptick in crime is a result of more ecological ways of using light. Please note, I'm not saying folks can't have security lights...I'm saying they could be installed better to alleviate light trespass and pollution. I have approached the mayor about this and sent him some research. I haven't heard from him yet, but I hope to soon. Let's just talk about this, okay?

Reply
Comment_arrow

gurb

11:16 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

I grew up on the far east side of Cherry Hill and I don't notice a difference in the amount of stars I can see. The light pollution doesn't start to really clear up until you get into Medford and beyond into the Pine Barrens, thanks to all the commercial areas and highways. Really, it just sounds like you're trying to turn a personal vendetta against a neighbor into a passive aggressive legislation crusade against someone that bothers you. It's becoming apparent that it's a you problem and not a we problem.

Comment_arrow

Angelo

11:16 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Suzanne, I may not agree with you 100% but I do applaud your efforts in at least starting a discussion about an issue that is important to you. I personally feel that the town’s streets and sidewalks need to be adequately lit for walking and driving around town safely. I also believe that security lights are useful in cutting down on crime. However, if there is a way to adequately light the streets and roadways without harsh light "trespassing" onto people's property, it should at least be discussed. I have never seen examples of how towns have redirected light to accomplish both, but you seem to have done your research. Perhaps you can post some websites of case studies and examples of how redirecting light can still light up our streets and walkways without encroaching on people’s backyards or blocking their view of the stars. If you can show some good examples of how this has been done successfully, I’m sure people would be more open to the idea. I, for one, have a hard time imagining what the town would look like if such an ordinance were passed and I fear that it would be too dark. That being said, I would definitely be more supportive of your idea if I could visualize a concept that can provide enough street light while, at the same time, address your concerns.

Comment_arrow

Jill Warner

10:44 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

some of these people are all about themselves, recently there was an article about people that have lived behind Bistro Marino and how since they have been there they have to listen to their noise much past the 10 oclock noise violation....if these people don't have the same problem as you they have no compation ...matter of fact they suck...I don't live behind Bistro Marino and I don't have a neighbor with lights but I am a human who understands what you are going through......HARD TO FIND THESE DAYS WITH ALL THESE PARANOID IDIOTS

Comment_arrow

Jill Warner

11:10 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

I am ashamed of this town...SO SELFISH

Comment_arrow

Von Lechner

11:34 am on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

If everyone on Earth could permanently ban something...just one thing...there would be nothing left. Think about it. Also think about how saying "...lights are being used as weapons" might make you sound like some darkness nut, and does nothing to further your cause.
Unless your neighbor's light is directly trained on your house, there shouldn't be a problem.
All the stores on Haddon Ave. have apartments above them, with streetlights "polluting" their living space. If it bugs the residents enough, they move.
The properties in densely populated areas are too close together for there to any effective security lighting that would not "pollute" neighboring properties.
Studies have shown that criminals, like cockroaches, scatter in the light.

Aileen

7:18 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

On my drive home last night, I could not find a single instance of "light pollution", or "lights being used as weapons". Collingswood did not look "lit up like an airport". I did note that things seemed rather dark and perhaps one reason for recent crime is that homes could use more lighting.

Reply

MAJ-13

11:16 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Wow, amazes me what ends up being "news." I cannot believe you'd want an "official ordinance" for bright lighting, that to me just sounds mildly insane but in the same respect I applaud you for having so much free time in your life to address what you feel is important. I still cannot get over the fact that a majority of what you're feeling has stemmed from your neighbor's lighting, and you claim you did address him/her about it. I would attribute it to the notion that sometimes in life, you just cannot have everything your way. We're all adults, and you, as a responsible adult of your community went to your neighbor and discussed the lighting on their property, and then they chose to not do anything about it, well then as unfortunate as it may be, oh well. We all have neighbors, and sometimes the relationships are not favorable ones, it's just how it goes, sort of like family, which is why in life you can pick your friends. In any event, I cannot believe you went to the mayor with this, for not only is it a cowardly move from the truth of what is creating a disturbance to you, you in turn take up more of the mayor's time with a matter that is not at all that important. I'm sorry, but I cannot see the value to the town as a whole from this "ordinance" being pursued and enforced. I think it's great you want to see stars, I do, but you are addressing it in all the wrong ways. Good luck in your quest, and if this doesn't work out I recommend the Fels Planetarium.

Reply

Ed B

11:16 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Lets not waste the mayors time. The ones that will be called to enforce the ordinance will fall on the hands of our police department anyway. Its just silly...is anyone going to NOT buy a house in Collingswood because their view of the night sky isn't clear??? This is a complete waste of passion & time.

Reply

Jim Miller

11:16 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Oops, mentioned brightness, aim and duration but forgot the most important setting...sensitivity! Admittedly this takes trial-and-error patience to get right if you don't want to unnecessarily disturb your neighbors. But what the heck, it's easier to just let it come on directed right in next-door's windows at every falling leaf, cat walking through the yard or wind gust, right?

Reply

Reed Rothchild

11:16 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Suzanne, I think you'd be better off making your case for an ordinance if you omitted the "seeing stars" portion of your proposal. I don't think most people would be against reasonable restrictions on the amount & caliber of light weapons to reasonable levels on their own property, limiting the collateral damage to their neighbors. The whole seeing stars thing, being as close to Philadelphia and considering the densely populated area of Collingswood and surrounding area is a little counterproductive...but I like your intentions.

Reply

Jasomm

11:16 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

http://cops.usdoj.gov/Publications/e1208-StreetLighting.pdf
Can we change the Poll to ask - What is a more important issue in Collingswood: 1)Crime, or 2) Circadian Rhythms?

This is one of the most commented-on articles in a long time, and it seems overwhelmingly that the opinions are on the side of 'this is not a problem' or 'this is just your problem', to 'there should actually be more lighting.'

This is more a story on civility, and conflict resolution with neighbors, than about seeing stars. I think we know this even if it is not admitted openly. Suggest this [http://www.darksky.org/outdoorlighting/74-manufacturers] to you neighbor, or offer to buy them one yourself.

Should this be a genuine crusade to bring starry skies back to this area, than join a club like the NJ Astronomical Association, or the International Dark Sky Association, and fight on under a legitimate banner and strategy, and more power to you. But I think you will find that Collingswood is not a reasonable/strategic place to focus that strategy. [http://policy.rutgers.edu/ceeep/eds/maps/Munic_Absolute_MWh_Usage.jpg]

Reply

Joe

11:26 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Ms. Cloud, I think you are oversimplifying a number of the opinions posted here. I also think you are being just a bit hyperbolic comparing Collingswood to an "airport" and equating light to "weapons".

I have to admit that I am at a loss to think of a single spot in town where light can be described as excessive. A reasonable example may be the board office at Zane North (which someone mentioned earlier) but I think we would all agree that security lighting at our schools is essential.

I have no problem talking about any issue and the great thing about living in a small town like Collingswood is that issues like this, really any issue, are easily discussed if people are willing to take the time (rather than just complain on Patch). For all the flak he takes around town, Jim Maley is infinitely approachable and responsive. You might not like the answers you get but you do get them.

Suzanne, I truly hope there is a solution that will make you happier to live in town but I would be ardently opposed to any ordinance that governs me leaving my porch lights on at night for security just because one of my neighbors cannot see Cassiopeia while walking the dog.

Reply

Jill Warner

10:42 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

1:23 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
I agree, some people should at least feel bad for her plight. neighbors suck sometimes and maybe this was just her way of trying to get attention for her issue.go to the bottom of Lees LANE at newton creek and come up lees LANE and the back of Froggies house looks like a circus is going on....now it doesn't bother me it is just an observation but if I lived there I would be pissed.

Reply

Jill Warner

10:42 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

oh by the way I noticed they were out tonight!!!!

Reply

C.V.

11:10 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Don't look into the light, Carol Ann!

Reply
Comment_arrow

C.V.

1:10 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

i am high-fiving myself for this one.

Von Lechner

11:34 am on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

It would seem logical that only those who love darkness would find light to be a pollutant.

Reply

Suzanne Cloud

11:34 am on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

I'm truly sorry to have brought this up at all. As someone who has lived and volunteered in Collingswood since 1984, I really thought folks would have been more sympathetic to a neighbor with a problem and to a discussion about improving the lighting in our town aesthetically. Apparently I was totally wrong. Forget it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe

2:16 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Suzanne, you should not be sorry to have brought up this issue. As I stated above, one of the great things about living in a small(er) town is the ease in starting this type of conversation. As a neighbor, your concerns should be important to all of us as we may all be similarly impacted by the same issue at some point.

That said, when you go public with an opinion, regardless of the topic and definitely when you are seeking additional ordinances on the books, you have to expect that there are going to be people who are going to disagree with you. Some may debate more artfully than others but it goes with the territory of "putting yourself out there". While I do not see a problem with Collingswood-produced light pollution, I applaud you standing up to be heard rather than sniping from the weeds like many in town.

Comment_arrow

Jill Warner

2:16 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

again I am so sorry, some of these people don't use this for discussions but are always waiting to pounce like a tiger with nastiness rather than conversation and paranoia is rampant in this town

Comment_arrow

Angelo

8:54 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

I agree with Joe. You should not feel sorry for bringing this up. Although it seems that there are a lot of people who don't agree with you, it is very important for residents to bring up their concerns and start a discussion about it. If the light trespassing ordinance is very important to you, you should dedicate more time and energy into educating the town about it and gaining more support. As I said before, I don't necessarily agree with your opinion, but I am definitely open to hearing more about it and I think other residents would also be more open to it if they could be assured that their concerns (crime, adequate street lighting, etc) would not be compromised by such an ordinance. You should not give up just because you have run into a lot of opposition on the Patch.

Von Lechner

8:54 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

Suzanne, you wanted a debate. How is it a debate if one is not allowed to have contrary opinions? Why are opposing opinions considered attacks? Are we all supposed to agree?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jill Warner

7:50 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

some of the peoples comments were almost like coiled snakes not just disagreeing

SJ Wootton

1:25 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

One solution may be to encourage the local government to install LED lights. They focus light downward, causing much less overspill, and give good lighting where it is needed.

They're more expensive to buy, but cost much less to run. Birmingham (UK) City Council replaced 95,000 old style street lamps with LED, and estimated that they would halve their street lighting bill.

Reply

Von Lechner

11:50 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

The streetlights are much dimmer than they were years ago, especially the amber ones. I fail to see the benefit of focusing the light downward, and the worry about "overspill" seems rather counter-intuitive. Ideally you want to light the streets for safety, and want as much of them lit as possible. Not just security, but safety is also sacrificed when light is seem as some sort of threat, since it's tricky navigating broken sidewalks in near darkness.

Reply

Jill Warner

10:46 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013

I dont think you understand ....she was trying to bring her own problem to this

Reply

teri

2:08 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

I don't think an ordinance should be an issue, I think common courtesy should be a bigger issue ! Yes, a 25 watt bulb will deter a criminal/ prankster. I do not think it is necessary to put in 60 watt bulbs or larger in an outside fixture especially HUGE FLOOD LIGHTS. They are intrusive on neighbors rights to 'quiet enjoyment' of their own properties . This is Collingswood for crying out loud, New York City has better respect for light pollution in Central Park than people do here ! I had neighbors that kept superbright flood lights on constantly at night... No consideration and I never, ever saw 1 person use the back yard in
10 years . So what is the point ?

Reply

Peeches

6:37 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

The point is security and peace of mind! Although mine has a light sensor so if someone or my favorite Racoon comes to visit, I know someone is out there.

Reply

Shirley

12:11 am on Sunday, February 24, 2013

A neighbor across the road has a security light on the rear corner of her house. The sensitivity is such that if a firefly alights on a blade of grass, the security light comes on - and it's as bright as a klieg light. All night long this flashing light bathes my bedroom in brightness. I can't imagine what it's like for the folks whose yard abuts hers. There is no point in asking her to make any adjustments. She can't even be arsed to bring in her trash bins.

Reply

Peeches

12:01 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

The off and on at the flicker of a firefly says the owner has the sensor set too high. Mine truly tells me when someone is out there in my yard. Also my light is yellow and points out only 12ft around. Never gets near a neighbors yard. I think alot has to do with the neighborhood you are in as well. If your homes are close together then a neighbor could see the light.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Shirley

5:35 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Of course the sensitivity is set too high. My own lights are yellow and illuminate the ground, where the perp is likely to be. I'm not sure what you mean by 'alot has to do with the neighborhood..' unless you mean it is unfortunate that we have a dimwit in our neighborhood.

No Buttstuff

10:12 am on Saturday, April 27, 2013

Just HOW many rooftop Margarita parties have to suffer before something is done about this?! Enough is enough! Keep fighting the good fight.

Reply

Leave a comment

 

The Collingswood Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks