patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Borough Beeswax: Buzzing About School Board Elections and the 2% Cap

What does Collingswood think about consolidating the school board and general elections?

 

A new state law allows school districts to move their school board elections to November, from April, and keep the school district budget off of the ballot, provided the spending plan doesn't exceed a 2 percent increase.

Proponents call it a way to save money by combining elections and to possibly increase voter turnout for school board elections. Some critics have decried removing direct voter input from the school budget—usually the largest chunk of taxpayers' tax bills. 

Last week, Collingswood's school board vote to move the elections. Borough Beeswax asked Collingswood residents and visitors for their thoughts on the impact of this issue.

“If it saves money, I would be for it,” said Audubon mother Kelly Paoli.

Paoli, who says she votes in school board elections, thinks voters who don’t usually turn out “would make the time to go” if Board of Education candidates were added to the general ballot.

Sam Shin, who recently moved to Collingswood from Philadelphia, agreed with her logic.

“Seems like it makes sense,” Shin said.

“As far as I understand, they’ll still have meetings and people can have input on the budget,” said Collingswood resident Francesca Vassalluzzo, who confesses that she’s “not really good about” remembering to vote for school board elections.

“It would make it easier to do it at the same time,” she said.

Condensing the school board and general elections “seems to simplify things,” said Marlton resident Elijah Smith, who believes that combined elections would elicit “a variety of input.”

“One-stop shopping,” said his wife, Tracey.

Jaclyn Bazan of Woodbury expressed relief at the prospect that her school district budget could be preserved without running the gauntlet of a public referendum.

Bazan said that in her town, the April school board elections are popular with “senior citizens and people who want to vote it down” almost exclusively.

The anti-tax climate has directly affected her daughter Mia’s classroom, Bazan said, where she’s seen “things dwindle” and “amazing teachers laid off.”

“A lot of people claim to support schools, but don’t get out to do it,” she said.

Bill Jaworski of Medford had the opposite view. Although the public school budget is one of the last remaining referendums in local politics, Jaworski believes it should still be put to the vote.

“I think we should be able to vote on the budget even within 2 percent,” he said. “What else can they take away from us?”

  • Do you agree with moving the school elections to November and removing the budget from the ballot?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes, it'll save money and/or increase voter turnout
        23 (41%)
    • No, voters should get a direct say in the budget.
        31 (55%)
    • Other (tell us in the comments)
        2 (3%)
    Total votes: 56
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
About this column: Borough Beeswax is a rebellious protest to 'minding your own beeswax' — because who really ever does? It's your borough, and you've got an opinion about what goes on. So when a hot topic arises in town, vent to Borough Beeswax — and then to your friends. Related Topics: 2 Percent Tax Cap, Board Of Education Budget, Board of Education, School Board Elections, and borough beeswax

libsrsic

8:35 am on Sunday, January 29, 2012

"Anti-tax climate"=over burdened citizens whose incomes are not keeping up with tax increases=1/2 the entire population of the United States.

Reply

Jaclyn Bazán

2:49 pm on Sunday, January 29, 2012

May I just clarify that my support was exclusively with moving the school vote to November to increase turnout and the variety of concerned citizens. I do not support altogether removing the budget from the ballot. I believe taxpayers should have full disclosure. - Jaclyn Bazan

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sean Andrew

6:22 am on Monday, January 30, 2012

Wow! This is not what the article says at all. It says quite the opposite.

Comment_arrow

Jaclyn Bazán

11:30 am on Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Sean: My comments on the street could have been construed that way, as meant that it would be best to have also the BUDGET vote in November. I guarantee it would pass being that more parents would be involved as opposed to those who generally come out to reject it in the spring. I understand their reasons, as they have been grossly misled by officials to believe that schools and the impoverished shelter the blame. My children now to go to a school where the Spanish teacher was replaced by a computer. It is outrageous. So, yes, I think there should always be a school budget vote due to the fact that it is the largest chunk of property taxes in my particular district, but I think it should be held at a time to ensure better turnout. I for one am willing to pay $20.00 more year to secure a full-time nurse or talented teacher. Education was once viewed as a matter of national security a few decades ago, and now it is viewed as a pointless “burden.” It upsets me and I found that I actually censored myself on the street so as to not sound like an overzealous “tax loving radical hippie.” Do I particularly enjoy my $5,000 annual taxes on an *extremely* small residence in a city with minute business revenue? No. But I and most parents are willing to shoulder a portion of the burden for our children if our representatives are not willing to properly tax millionaires.

Comment_arrow

Jeff Stern

12:45 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012

"But I and most parents are willing to shoulder a portion of the burden for our children if our representatives are not willing to properly tax millionaires."

Surely you have misspoken again. You must have meant "if our representatives are not willing to over-tax job creators."

Go capitalism!

Comment_arrow

Sean Andrew

2:25 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Jaclyn - I agree with what you said on the street and in this last post, except for the Spanish thing. I learned much more Spanish online than from 6 years of Spanish in HS and college. I got all As and Bs and couldn't speak a lick. I guess it depends how you learn, but OUTRAGEOUS it is not.

Shirley

4:35 pm on Sunday, January 29, 2012

Having input on the budget at a school board meeting is not the same as having the opportunity to vote on it. I am very unhappy about not being able to vote on the budget. I don't understand why citizens do not exercise their right to vote. Many seem to be quite happy to gripe about the outcome of an election but are unable to shift their arses to vote and make a difference. Being too busy is not an excuse. What other rights are you willing to give up because you're too busy?

Reply

Sean Andrew

6:21 am on Monday, January 30, 2012

At least every penny of my school tax goes to my own community. Why do folks get all worked up about the school budget vote, but no one pushes for a vote on the municipal, county, state, or federal budget? No one loves taxes, but I'd rather let my elected neighbors, all volunteers, decide how to spend my tax money than some elected yo-yo in Trenton or DC. What percentage of our federal tax money comes back to our own community or even our state? Let's vote on that...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Porterincollingswood

8:17 am on Monday, January 30, 2012

A ton of federal tax dollars were used by Rick Perry to plug a gaping hole in his state's education budget. You and I essentially fund those schools.

But you don't hear about that because it doesn't further the conservative narrative.

Leave a comment

 

The Collingswood Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks